Skip Nav

What Is the Difference Between Weak Negative and Non-Negative Ethical Views?

Professional Help with Writing Your Ethical Essay Papers

❶Most of the times, it is experiences and the way a person is brought up that decide his actions and hence his morality and ethics. Has the author presented an objective, well-reasoned account of the topic?

Post navigation

Professional Editing From $7.5/page
How to cite this page
Related Topics:

An ethical essay is different from other types of essay papers, as it requires profound background information. An ethics essay should discuss and analyze issues through the prism of philosophical principles. While attempting ethics papers students must be able to correlate the topic with moral sensibility and decision making. An ethics research paper is written with a strong thesis statement which is substantiated with examination of perspectives.

For example a business ethics essay would deal with a practical situation and compare it with theoretical principles. The ethical essay would also examine philosophical ideas and see if they have contemporary relevance. An ethical paper could also have an argumentative tenor. Ethics essays highlight the deep understanding of the writer. For example in a business ethics essay, the writer could examine the code of business ethics in terms of origin and relevance.

Let us assume the framework of Fig. In contrast, if happiness has value for the world, it makes the world or the overall outcome better. This value for the world is what consequentialism says we should bring about. One can discuss these two ways in which something can have value separately: One can get to, for example, Fig. There is an interesting question of at which "step" the negativity "sets in.

Combining the two steps in figures 4a and 4b results in Fig. Alternatively, one can arrive at Fig. In other words, happiness and suffering are equally good and bad for you, but it is more important for the value of the world that you are not suffering. Again, by combining Fig. Similarly, one can arrive at, for example, Fig. Toggle navigation Foundational Research Institute. Other versions of this piece PDF. Contents Terminology The views under consideration Weak negative utilitarianism and consequentialism The Weak Negative Doctrine Weak negative axiology The difference between weak negative and non-negative views assuming happiness and suffering are objectively highly measurable If statements about magnitudes of happiness versus suffering involve value judgements Weak negative and non-negative views are equally affected When is it accurate to describe non-negative and weak negative views as symmetric vs.

Weak negative and non-negative as labels of tendencies to make different assessments of happiness and suffering Appendix: Value for an individual versus value for the world—where does the negativity set in? More on this kind of terminology can be found here. I broadly follow the understanding of weak and strong negative utilitarianism in Arrhenius and Bykvist A difference is that my use of weak negative utilitarianism is more inclusive than Brian Tomasik's use of the term negative-leaning utilitarianism.

I use the term 'weak negative utilitarianism' somewhat differently from Ord and from how Tomasik uses 'negative-leaning utilitarianism' in that I would say that weak negative utilitarianism need not assign vastly greater or a lot more weight to suffering than to happiness; simply assigning more weight to suffering is enough. However, this difference in use is not crucial for this essay.

For example, see Arrhenius and Bykvist I avoid the phrase 'Classical Utilitarianism' because it appears too narrow. One can be a non-negative utilitarian, and be as concerned with reducing suffering as with promoting happiness, without endorsing all the ingredients of Classical Utilitarianism.

According to Sinnott-Armstrong , "classic utilitarianism is actually a complex combination of many distinct claims, including the following [eleven] claims about the moral rightness of acts. I am concerned with versions of utilitarianism including traditional utilitarianism and weak negative utilitarianism that are utilitarian in the sense of holding that the only thing that matters morally is the value of outcomes, that such value should be assessed impersonally, that the value of outcomes only depends on individuals' well-being, and that distribution of well-being e.

I do not require that a utilitarian view considers the value of outcomes to depend on the sum of well-being or the sum of happiness minus the sum of suffering.

As I see utilitarianism, one can be a utilitarian and believe that well-being is not additive. For example, see the discussion of ordinal utilitarianism here. Similar to the way I used 'weak negative utilitarianism,' I would prefer to use the 'Weak Negative Doctrine' to refer to the full range of positions between the Strong Negative and the Positive Doctrine, but that is not crucial to this essay. For example, Hurka focuses on axiology and discusses, among other things, what he calls the Moore-Mayerfeld view.

Moore saying that "while pleasure has 'at most some slight intrinsic value,' pain is 'a great evil'. Hurka quotes Jamie Mayerfeld saying that "suffering is more bad than happiness is good" Hurka , Those sources include more variants. Other terms than 'value for the world' seem to be used for the same thing in the philosophical literature, including 'value-period,' 'straightforward value,' 'value simpliciter ', 'absolute value,' 'ethical value,' 'contributive value' as in the contribution that something makes to the value of a world , etc.

Others who have presented these kinds of graphs tend to put one of these terms, or a something term, on the vertical axis: Hurka puts 'value,' by which he most likely means value for the world. For example, he speaks about the goodness and badness of worlds on page Ord puts 'moral value,' which I take to be essentially the same as my value for the world.

This is one way to illustrate a weak threshold negative view. The idea of smallest noticeable increments dates back at least to Edgeworth See this section for more information. There are some interesting questions about how weak negative views can be distinguished from non-negative if happiness and suffering are objectively measurable in principle but not on the same ratio scale as Fig. For example if happiness and suffering are measurable on different ratio scales, or only on the same interval or ordinal scale.

For example, some have worked on ordinal versions of utilitarianism. See Mendola and Hardin I set these questions aside to focus on what happens with the distinction between weak negative and non-negative views if claims about magnitudes of happiness versus suffering involve value judgements. Similarly, perhaps in these cases the judgement whether a certain amount of happiness is just greater than a certain amount of unhappiness is not independent of the judgement that the point has just been reached where one would prefer a situation in which they are combined" page Here Hurka refers to Griffin Otherwise, it is likely that, if there are prioritarian weights in the first place, then we have already factored them in, when we assess how well off an individual is at a certain moment.

Assume also that the person with the weak-negative view and the person with the non-negative view both agree on this ordering.

Ord perhaps sees a similar problem with weak negative utilitarianism in the section "Weak NU — The incoherence argument," in which he, among other things, says that "A major problem with Weak NU is that it appears to be incoherent. What could it mean for suffering to matter more than happiness? It suggests an image such as this: There are three ideals of human life, Viz, Truth, and Beauty and good which are the supreme values in human experience.

They correspond to the three aspects of our conscious life-knowing, feeling and willing. Logic is concerned with the general conditions involved in the pursuit of Truth. Aesthetics is concerned with the creation and appreciation of Beauty. Ethics is concerned with what is right in human action in the pursuit of God. Thus logic, Aesthetic and Ethics are normative science, because they are concerned with the ideals of Truth, Beauty and Good respectively.

They concerned with norms, ideals or values, but not concerned with facts or events that happen in nature. Logic interprets and explains our judgements of intellectual value. Aesthetics interprets and explain our judgements of Aesthetic value. Similarly, Ethics interprets and explain our judgements of moral value. Logic is the science of truth.

Ethics is the science of Good and Aesthetics is the science of Beauty. Truth is the ideal of knowledge, Good is the ideals of will and Beauty is the ideal of feeling or emotion. Of the three parts of the universe-God, world and man. Ethics is particularly concerned with man. It is the business of Ethics to determine what human good is and not what cosmic good is.

Thus ethics determines the moral ideal or the highest good of man. Ethics differs from the natural sciences, because it treat man as a self-conscious being who is conscious of his relation to the physical and social environment, whereas the latter treat man as a biological animal who is originally related to his physical environment.

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Ethics is a word that can be used loosely, so it’s important to understand the meaning of this question by first discussing what is meant by personal ethics or professional ethics. I assume the question is using the term personal ethics to mean one’s conscience and the term professional ethics to mean adherence to a professional code.

Privacy FAQs

An ethic is driven by a moral, an idea of what is right and wrong, what should and shouldn't be. Ethics are the driving force behind every action and decision a person makes. Weather choosing tactful words to use when speaking to a person who might get offended to ordering dinner, every decision /5(16).

About Our Ads

This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. Ethics is important to every society as it plays a critical role in shaping the individuals behaviours within a society. Since the dawn of human civilization, men have sought to keep human conduct in check to preserve the peace of society. Moral and ethics are of high importance in determining the nature of a society or a culture. Morals and ethics are used as complimentary terms but they mean different in literal sense. Morals define personal character and refer to the beliefs that a person practices when he interacts in personal and.

Cookie Info

Ethics Essay Rafael Aguilera Jr. University of Phoenix ETH/ Ethics and Social Responsibility Ryan Busch In this paper the similarities and differences between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics will be explored. Virtue theory, utilitarianism. Free Essay: Ethics are moral principles or values that govern the conduct of an individual or a is not a burden to bear, but a prudent and effective.